1.0 INTENDED
USE
This
reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of a‑Amylase
activity in serum.
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 METHOD
AND HISTORY
The
classic method of determining a‑Amylase activity is enzymatic hydrolysis
of a starch substrate followed by product analysis. The saccharogenic
analysis method (10.2,10.3) measures the quantity of
reducing sugars formed. There are
difficulties associated with this method such as inconsistent results due to
variations in substrate preparation and treatment.
Other
methods of analysis include the dye‑starch substrate methods (10.4) and
the amyloclastics methods (10.5). Each has drawbacks (10.6,10.7). Modified saccharogenic
methods have been introduced recently which utilize a defined oligosaccharide
substrate. These substrates produce
colorimetric products when coupled with p‑nitrophenyl. Wallenfels et al
(10.11) introduced p-nitrophenylglycosides as defined
substrates for a-amylase determination in a procedure that eliminates
interference from endogenous glucose and pyruvate.
2.2 TEST
PRINCIPLE
The
present procedure is based on modifications of Wallenfels,
using as substrate a silyl-blocked p-nitrophenyl-a-D-malthoheptaoside to reduce spontaneous
degradation of the substrate by a-glucosidase and glucoamylase. The
test is performed in a kinetic mode with a very short lag time and offers much
greater stability that previous amylase methodologies.
a-amylase
PNPG7 ‑‑-----‑------------>
PNPG3 + maltotetraose
glucoamylase
PNPG3
‑‑‑-----------------> PNPG1 + glucose
a-glucosidase
PNPG1
‑‑‑-----------------> p-nitrophenol
+ glucose
a-Amylase
hydrolyzes p-nitrophenyl-a-D-malthoheptaoside (PNPG7)
to p-nitrophenylmaltotriose (PNPG3) and maltotetraose. Glucoamylase hydrolyzes PNPG3 to p-nitrophenylglycose
(PNPG1) and glucose. Then PNPG1 is
hydrolyzed by a-glucosidase to glucose and p-nitrophenol, which produces a yellow color. The rate of increase in absorbance
is measured at 405nm and is proportional to the a-amylase activity in the
sample.
2.3 CLINICAL
SIGNIFICANCE
Assays
for the a‑Amylase activity are of interest for the evaluation of
pancreatic function of the diagnosis of pancreatic disease. The greatest elevation in serum a‑Amylase
activity is seen in acute pancreatitis and
obstruction of pancreatic duct (10.1).
3.0 SPECIMEN
COLLECTION AND HANDLING
3.1 PATIENT
PREPARATION
No special patient preparation is
required.
3.2 SPECIMEN
COLLECTION.
Fresh,
clear, unhemolyzed serum is the preferred
specimen. It is known that many of the
common anticoagulants inhibit a‑Amylase activity (10.1). Therefore a‑Amylase assays should be
performed on serum samples.
Use a standard venipuncture tube to draw patient sample.
The
amount of sample required will depend on the analyzer used. The amount of serum required is in the range
of 5-50 µl. Call Biotron's
technical service department at 1-800-595-8766 for the recommended sample
volume for your analyzer.
Record
the patient's name, date and time of sample collection and preparation.
3.3 SPECIMEN
STORAGE
Amylase
in serum is reported stable for one week at room temperature (18-26°C) and for
two months when stored refrigerated at 2-8°C. (10.1)
It is
recommended that testing be done as soon as possible after sample collection
and preparation. If testing cannot occur
immediately, store the sample properly using the guidelines above.
4.0 MATERIALS
(10 X 5 ml)
(6.X50 ml)
Reagents necessary for the determination of a‑Amylase are included in the kit.
4.1 REAGENT
a‑Amylase
reagent contains, after reconstitution with deionized
water:
p‑nitrophenyl‑a‑D‑malthohexaoside 0.7 mM
a-glucosidase
(microbial) ³ 20,000 U/L
glucoamylase
(microbial) ³ 10,000 U/L
sodium chloride 50
mM
calcium chloride 5
mM
buffer
pH 6.7 ± 0.1
sodium azide as
preservative 0.01%
4.2 WARNINGS
AND PRECAUTIONS
For In
Vitro Diagnostic Use. Not for Internal
use in Humans or Animals. In
Vitro Diagnostics reagents may be hazardous.
Avoid ingestion and skin or eye contact.
This reagent contains sodium azide (0.01%) as
a preservative. Sodium azide may react with lead and copper plumbing to form
highly explosive metal azides. Upon disposal, flush with a large volume of
water to prevent azide build up.
4.3 REAGENT
PREPARATION
4.3.1
Each reagent
vial is reconstituted with 10ml of deionized
water. Replace the rubber stopper and
allow 5 minutes for reconstitution.
Swirl gently until the contents of the vial are completely
dissolved. Record the date and time of
reconstitution.
4.3.2
Each reagent
vial is reconstituted with 50ml of deionized
water. Replace the rubber stopper and
allow 5 minutes for reconstitution.
Swirl gently until the contents of the vial are completely
dissolved. Record the date and time of
reconstitution.
4.4 REAGENT
STORAGE AND STABILITY
When
stored at 2°-8°C unopened reagents are stable until the expiration date printed
on the label. The working reagent is
stable for 10 days at room temperature (18°-26°C) or 60 days when refrigerated
(2°-8°C.)
Do not
use if the absorbance of the reagent is greater than
0.600 when measured at 405nm against water in a cuvette
with a 1cm path length or if the reagent fails to meet stated parameters of
performance.
4.5 ADDITIONAL
MATERIALS REQUIRED
4.5.1 A spectrophotometer or colorimeter capable of
reading absorbance accurately at 405 nm.
4.5.2 1 cm cuvettes or a
flow cell capable of transmitting light at 405 nm.
4.5.3 Test tubes capable of holding 2 ml.
4.5.4 Pipettes capable of delivering 1 ml and 20 µl.
4.5.5 Timer with 30 second increments.
4.5.6 Constant temperature heat source which can be
adjusted to 37° C.
4.5.7 Normal and abnormal controls for quality
control.
5.0 TEST
PROCEDURE
The following is a general procedure
for use on a manual instrument.
5.1 PROCEDURE
CONDITIONS
Wavelength 405
nm
Temperature 37°
C
Pathlength 1
cm
Mode Kinetic
Reaction Time 2
min.
Sample Volume 20
µl
Reagent volume 1.0
ml
Total Volume 1.20
ml
Sample to reagent ratio 1/50
5.2 INSTRUMENT
Any
instrument capable of reading absorbance accurately
with a sensitivity of 0.001 absorbance at 405 nm may be used. The
band width should be 10 nm or less, stray light 0.5%
or less, and the wavelength accuracy within 2 nm.
5.3 CALIBRATION
No
reagent calibration is necessary as this method is standardized by means of the
molar absorptivity of p‑nitrophenyl
taken as 8.5 at 405nm under the test conditions described.
5.4 PROCEDURE
5.4.1 Prepare the required volume of working reagent
(see 4.3 Reagent Preparation Section.)
5.4.2 Pipette 1.0ml of reagent into tubes labeled
"control", "patient", etc.
DO NOT PIPETTE BY MOUTH.
5.4.3 Pre-incubate all tubes at 37°C for at least
five minutes.
5.4.4 Zero spectrophotometer with water at 405nm.
5.4.5 Add 0.020ml (20µl) of sample and read after 30
seconds.
5.4.6 Record the absorbance
at 30 second intervals for 2 minutes.
5.5
CALCULATION
AND RESULTS
5.1.1 Amylase
U/L =
DA/min X assay volume (ml)
X 1000
‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑-------------
= DA/min X
3750
8.5
X light path (cm) X sample volume (ml) x 1.6
DA/min = change in absorbance per minute
assay volume = 1.2 (ml)
1000 = converts U/ml to U/L
8.5 = absorbance
coefficient of p‑nitrophenyl at 405 nm
lightpath =
1 (cm)
sample volume = 0.02 (ml)
1.6 = conversion factor from 37 to 25°C
3750 = factor derived from constants
in the equation
Example:
0.019 X 1.02 X 1000
Amylase U/ L = ‑‑‑‑‑‑----‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑-----
= 0.019 X 3750 = 71 U/L
8.5 X 1
X 0.02
6.0 INTERPRETATION
OF RESULTS
6.1 EXPECTED
VALUES
The range of expected values is:
0 ‑ 93 U/L (37 degrees C)
These
values are suggested guidelines. It is
recommended that each laboratory establish the normal range for the area in
which it is located.
6.2 LINEARITY
This
procedure is linear through 2500 U/L beyond which the specimen should be
diluted with an equal volume of saline. Reassay the specimen and multiply the results by 2.
6.3 MEDICAL
ALERT VALUES (10.10)
Each
laboratory should establish low and high values beyond which the patient would
require immediate attention by a physician.
If a "medical alert value" is reached, always repeat the test
to confirm the result and notify a physician if the result is confirmed.
6.4 LIMITATIONS
OF PROCEDURE
Young
(10.8) gives a list of drugs and other substances that interfere with the
determination of amylase activity.
7.0 QUALITY
CONTROL
Standard
practice for quality control should be applied to this system. Commercially available lyophilized controls
can be used to monitor the daily acceptable variations. Normal and abnormal controls should be
assayed at the beginning of each run of patient samples, whenever a new reagent
or a different lot number is being used, and following any system maintenance.
A
satisfactory level of performance is achieved when the analyte
values obtained are within the "acceptable range" established by the
laboratory.
8.0 CALIBRATION
PROCEDURES
No
routine reagent calibration is necessary as this method is standardized by
means of the molar absorptivity of p‑nitrophenyl taken as 8.5 at 405nm under the test conditions
described.
The results
obtained when measuring the activity of a kinetic reaction are based on the
change in absorbance per minute. In order to accurately monitor and report
this reaction rate, the operating parameters of the spectrophotometer
(wavelength, temperature of the reaction and timing of the test) must be known
and controlled.
9.0 PERFORMANCE
CHARACTERISTICS
9.1 PRECISION
The
estimates of precision shown below were obtained from assays of human control
serum.
Within-Run
Mean (U/L) SD (U/L) CV (%)
48 ±
0.6 1.3
492 ±
2.6 0.5
Between-Run
Mean (U/L) SD (U/L) CV (%)
51 ±
2.0 3.9
489 ±
7.9 1.6
9.2 CORRELATION
A
correlation study was done comparing this method (y) and a similar comparative
method (x). The samples ranged from 15
to 771 U/L. The study yielded a
regression curve of y = 0.98 x -0.5 with a correlation of 0.999.
9.3 LINEARITY
Linearity: This procedure is linear through 2500 U/L
beyond which the specimen should be diluted with an equal volume of
saline. Reassay
the specimen and multiply the results by 2.
9.4 SENSITIVITY
A change
in absorbance of 0.001 DA/min at 405nm at 37° C
corresponds to 6.0 U/L.
10.0 REFERENCES
10.1 Tietz, N.W., (Editor) Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry, W.B.
Saunders Company, Philadelphia (1982).
10.2 Somogyi, M., J.
Biol. Chem., 125:399 (1938).
10.3 Henry, R.J., Chiamori, N., Clin, Chem., 6:434
(1960).
10.4 Klein, B., Foreman, J., Searry,
R., Clin. Chem., 16:32 (1970).
10.5 Somogyl, M., Clin. Chem., 6:23 (1960).
10.6 Kaufman, R.A., Tietz, N.W., Clin.
Chem., 26:846 (1980).
10.7 Rauscher, E., Neumann, U., Schaich, E., von Bulow, S., Wahlefeld, A.W., Clin. Chem.,
31:14 (1985).
10.8 Young, D.S., Effects of Drugs on Clinical
Laboratory Tests, 3rd ed., Washington DC, AACC Press (1990).
10.9 Tietz, N.E.,
(Editor) Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests, W.B. Saunders Company,
Philadelphia (1983) p. 54.
10.10 G.J. Kost,
"Critical Limits for Urgent Clinician Notification at U.S. Medical
Centers"; JAMA, Feb. 2, 1990; Vol 263, No.5,
p.704
10.11 Wallenfels, K., et
al, Carbohydrate Research 61:359 (1978).